Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: RWR Brevity

  1. #11
    Yep, that'd be why. I'm primarily referencing the NATO manuals.

  2. #12
    I'm unexpectedly free now this afternoon/evening so I've gone and done a few updates to the 3-1.1. including returning DIRT based on this discussion.

  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Eddie For This Useful Post:

    IronHog (26Jun15), Rascal (26Jun15)

  4. #13
    Senior Member Gunny's Avatar
    United States
       United States
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    657

    Awards Showcase

    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,003
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    535
    Thanked in
    284 Posts
    Tried to get my hands on the 2014 Brevity but it's still Restricted in the ALSA Center

    Here's an AIR LAND SEA BULLETIN that might be of interest. Joint Close
    Air Support

    I can't attach it, so I put it in my dropbox.

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/rtck4h0w5q...0ALSB.pdf?dl=0

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Gunny For This Useful Post:

    Coolhand (26Jun15)

  6. #14

    Da FAC?


    476vFG GC
    Founding member
    Stuka's Avatar
    Belgium
       Belgium
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    8,190

    Awards Showcase

    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,239
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,650
    Thanked in
    2,482 Posts
    Way ahead of you

    Providing CAS when you're all out of HUA!

  7. #15
    Senior Member PFunk's Avatar
    Canada
       Canada
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    707
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    112
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    388
    Thanked in
    217 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Noodle View Post
    Per open source:

    RWR indication of a surface threat in Search mode is DIRT.

    RWR indication of a surface threat in Track mode is MUD.

    RWR indication of a surface threat missile launch is SINGER.

    Edit: And for the record, DCS' modeling of the RWR and anything related to EW/EA/EP is abysmal. I generally feel like the DCS RWR is a noisemaker that's only there to add aural ambiance while flying, and it doesn't even do that correctly.
    So could you or someone else put these into a DCS context then, such as in a phrase used in a particular scenario we are familiar with to ensure its perfectly clear to all of us how these terms should be appropriately used so that someone like myself doesn't reinforce an incorrect use.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


Like our website?

You can help us by donating to cover our costs.

Many sincere thanks!


Search

Follow us

Twitter Twitter youtube iTunes Subscribe to our Podcast